I was listening to NPR the other day and they were talking about how the elections are discussed in the media. One thing that surprised me was the discussion from the guest who suggested that Fox News was asking the hard questions, particularly citing Brett Baier and Bill O'Reilly.
In the past, I have had many colleagues claim that Fox News "makes up" the news; however, if you look at the NEWS programs, (not programming like Sean Hannity or even Bill O'Reilly) you will find that the cable networks (CNN, FOX) are more balanced and unbiased in their reporting than the national news networks (NBC, CBS, ABC).
I would argue that it's important to get your news from a variety of sources rather than following one alone. I LOVE to listen to NPR, watch the local news, and follow some of the Cable stations.
My big question is-- Have you considered the role of the news in your participation as citizens?
This blog is for current and former students of Dr. Susan Talley's Families and Social Policy class to continue the discussion started during class. You, your friends, and interested family members are welcome to post about current events and how it might affect families. The only rules are to be respectful of all perspectives and to think critically about the discussion.
Monday, December 12, 2011
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Studying families
I recently read an article discussing which companies are happiest. The first of the criteria to determine "happy" was the company's work/life balance.
I find this interesting that researchers (and companies) are starting to realize that happy employees are more productive. That means, allowing people flexibility in their work environment to manage family responsibilities. To see the article: http://finance.yahoo.com/photos/companies-with-the-happiest-employees-1323452888-slideshow/
A GREAT reason to study families!
I find this interesting that researchers (and companies) are starting to realize that happy employees are more productive. That means, allowing people flexibility in their work environment to manage family responsibilities. To see the article: http://finance.yahoo.com/photos/companies-with-the-happiest-employees-1323452888-slideshow/
A GREAT reason to study families!
I'm BAAAACK!!!!
Now that we have lots of discussions between candidates and a new presidential election coming up, it's time to start the blog going again.
I just read that Mitt Romney offered Rick Perry and $10,000 bet during the last debate. The problem with this is NOT the amount of the bet, but the focus on class warfare. Romney has money. Others do not. Should we demonize those who have money? Are they all bad? Why is that the issue rather than the candidate's values on health care? Family values?
I have to confess, I am not for class warfare; however, I do agree that there are institutional problems with how money is managed. Those with money are able to get away with more than those who do not. For example, I know of a realtor who was able to take mortgage payments from a couple who bought a house from him. He was obligated to apply that mortgage payment to their home loan; however, he took the money and put it toward his over-extended lifestyle. The result was the couple lost their home to foreclosure. There were no repercussions for his theft. He is still in business.
This is an injustice that we should be paying attention to. White collar crime goes unpunished most of the time because we either don't pay attention or don't understand how it affects us until it's too late. This is the important aspect of the debate, NOT whether Mitt Romney has lots of money or that corporations pay their CEO's a bonus. If they are employing people and the wage is competitive...what's wrong with that?
Bottom line, I challenge everyone to focus on the real MEAT of the debate and not on superficial issues. We are not a democracy. We are a republic. What does that mean for our choice of candidate?
Best! I look forward to a great semester!
s
I just read that Mitt Romney offered Rick Perry and $10,000 bet during the last debate. The problem with this is NOT the amount of the bet, but the focus on class warfare. Romney has money. Others do not. Should we demonize those who have money? Are they all bad? Why is that the issue rather than the candidate's values on health care? Family values?
I have to confess, I am not for class warfare; however, I do agree that there are institutional problems with how money is managed. Those with money are able to get away with more than those who do not. For example, I know of a realtor who was able to take mortgage payments from a couple who bought a house from him. He was obligated to apply that mortgage payment to their home loan; however, he took the money and put it toward his over-extended lifestyle. The result was the couple lost their home to foreclosure. There were no repercussions for his theft. He is still in business.
This is an injustice that we should be paying attention to. White collar crime goes unpunished most of the time because we either don't pay attention or don't understand how it affects us until it's too late. This is the important aspect of the debate, NOT whether Mitt Romney has lots of money or that corporations pay their CEO's a bonus. If they are employing people and the wage is competitive...what's wrong with that?
Bottom line, I challenge everyone to focus on the real MEAT of the debate and not on superficial issues. We are not a democracy. We are a republic. What does that mean for our choice of candidate?
Best! I look forward to a great semester!
s
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Divorce issues
I just read the most troubling article in the Daily Herald. The author documented that a mother was charged with the sexual abuse of her daughter hoping to implicate the father in a custody battle. There is evidence of all kinds of problems with parents who are battling custody issues where the parents end up behaving badly. Parental Alienation Syndrome is one of them. I think we are seeing this more than we would like. The issues of divorce and custody are a serious problem, especially in high conflict cases. These are few and far between, but when we have parents resorting to abusing their children in custody battles, that's serious! Representatives Tim Cosgrove and Lorie Fowlke have both tried to create legislation that reduces the damage of divorce; however, when the state gets involved in family issues, I'm not convinced that they can improve the outcome.
I am really curious about whether or not the divorce education classes make a difference in the parents behavior in the case of divorce. Is the state of Utah doing any kind of evaluation to support the divorce education classes? Do they work? Or, we we causing parents to spend time and money that's just another hoop for them to jump through?
If you want to read the article, here's where I found the link:
http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/article_13544491-50ae-558b-9ad1-6fb7ad27e27b.html
I am really curious about whether or not the divorce education classes make a difference in the parents behavior in the case of divorce. Is the state of Utah doing any kind of evaluation to support the divorce education classes? Do they work? Or, we we causing parents to spend time and money that's just another hoop for them to jump through?
If you want to read the article, here's where I found the link:
http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/article_13544491-50ae-558b-9ad1-6fb7ad27e27b.html
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Guest worker programs and AZ-type attempts to handle illegal immigration
I have been following with interest some of the discussions about undocumented immigrants. There are more than two sides to this issue. I would like to point out that it's difficult for us to find good information on this because of the breadth of the problem. We honestly have no idea how many undocumented immigrants are in the country, but some hospital administrators are starting to document the costs of health care. Schools in Texas, California, Arizona, New Mexico and others have been dealing with the costs of education for undocumented immigrants. They have to provide bilingual teachers, etc. When children aren't doing well in school, we can predict all kinds of problems.
However, on the other hand, some of the undocumented people come here thinking they can get a visa to work, or they are being manipulated by unscrupulous people. Whenever there is a policy that isn't enforced well, we will have problems with people taking advantage of the system. An excellent example of this is the slave trade system and agricultural workers. There are lots of stories about people who were lied to when coming to this country and then are abused, beaten, raped, etc. They can't report their injuries if they are undocumented. So, what to do?
Representative Bill Wright and others are debating these problems on Capitol Hill as we speak. Check out this story if you are interested.
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=833&sid=14404836
There are hosts of other stories on this topic. It would be interesting to see if we can collect a bunch of them to attempt to understand the many sides of the undocumented immigrants.
Best!
However, on the other hand, some of the undocumented people come here thinking they can get a visa to work, or they are being manipulated by unscrupulous people. Whenever there is a policy that isn't enforced well, we will have problems with people taking advantage of the system. An excellent example of this is the slave trade system and agricultural workers. There are lots of stories about people who were lied to when coming to this country and then are abused, beaten, raped, etc. They can't report their injuries if they are undocumented. So, what to do?
Representative Bill Wright and others are debating these problems on Capitol Hill as we speak. Check out this story if you are interested.
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=833&sid=14404836
There are hosts of other stories on this topic. It would be interesting to see if we can collect a bunch of them to attempt to understand the many sides of the undocumented immigrants.
Best!
Thursday, February 3, 2011
First Family Impact Seminar
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Utah's First Family Impact Seminar is History!
For our first Family Impact Seminar (FIS), we discussed the Unified Family Courts (UFC) model. We had representatives from the Juvenile Justice System provide information describing how our Juvenile Justice System in Utah "gets it" when it comes to family courts issues.
I found the discussion quite interesting! The UFC model is an attempt to keep family issues in the same court with the same judge. Utah is considered NOT to have a UFC system because it's not completely family oriented even though it is family driven. It's interesting how the two models are similar and different at the same time. Speakers Gloria Danziger from the University of Baltimore Law School, Lynn Wardle from the BYU Law School, Lorie Fowlke, former House Representative, Ray Wahl and Judge Kimberly Hornak all spoke and did a fantastic job! The interesting outcome is that many of the speakers and discussants want to continue discussions! I am excited to see what happens as a result.
We didn't have as many legislators as I hoped. However, we did have some key people attend the seminar and lots of interest. I will be creating materials discussing the outcome and sending to all legislators.
It was an exciting, exhausting and exhilarating experience! I hope you can all come to our next event! I'll post pictures as I can get them uploaded.
I found the discussion quite interesting! The UFC model is an attempt to keep family issues in the same court with the same judge. Utah is considered NOT to have a UFC system because it's not completely family oriented even though it is family driven. It's interesting how the two models are similar and different at the same time. Speakers Gloria Danziger from the University of Baltimore Law School, Lynn Wardle from the BYU Law School, Lorie Fowlke, former House Representative, Ray Wahl and Judge Kimberly Hornak all spoke and did a fantastic job! The interesting outcome is that many of the speakers and discussants want to continue discussions! I am excited to see what happens as a result.
We didn't have as many legislators as I hoped. However, we did have some key people attend the seminar and lots of interest. I will be creating materials discussing the outcome and sending to all legislators.
It was an exciting, exhausting and exhilarating experience! I hope you can all come to our next event! I'll post pictures as I can get them uploaded.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)